The
experiences that I’ve had over the past week reveal my own ignorance of
Philippine history and custom while at the same time answers the question, “Why
didn’t I know this?”. In Erlyn Ruth E. Alcantara’s article, Baguio Between Two Wars: The Construction
and Destruction of a Summer Capital, her main
point is to illustrate
the United States’ strength, power, and most importantly indifference to what
happens to areas and the inhabitants it colonizes. This is true for many
countries that have taken the opportunity to exert force over another. The
history of Baguio illustrates the physical destruction of American rule and
power. Like the physical destruction of Baguio, a deleterious consequence of
colonization is the mental destruction and inter-generational trauma of the
people. In Third Andresen’s chapter, he argues Filipino American students have
difficulty constructing a positive worldview and cultural-historical
perspective because of the way Philippine history is framed in
American textbooks (Andresen 76). I will compare and contrast the
physical and mental destructive consequences of the colonization of the
Philippines in the context of our activities: Kidlat Tahimik’s screening of Perfect Nightmare and visiting Baguio
city. After, I will argue that the mental consequences of colonization are not
as often recognized as the physical destruction.
The
method in which Baguio was created is a microcosm of all other colonizing
efforts of the United States. In her article, Alcantara walks the reader
through the creation and destruction of Baguio city. The interest in Baguio as
a sanctuary for American soldiers negatively affected the environment and the
way of life of the people (Alcantara 214). The focus on the gold mines
motivated American capitalist actions to drain as much of the resource as
possible. This is an example of the environmental or physical destruction of
colonization. The way of life of the indigenous population was also affected.
Alcantara states, “New colonial policies reshaped Baguio Ibaloy society as
these eroded the base of the village economy…” (Alcantara 216). Finally, the
United States eventually bombed Baguio after spending millions of dollars to
create the city because of militaristic goals. The
physical destruction of colonization is obvious and easy to recognize. While
visiting Baguio city, I noticed the American vibe of the built environment. The
remnants of U.S. occupation of Baguio are still very prevalent today with its
focus on tourism.
The
destructive consequences of colonization on the mind are more difficult to
detect and understand. As a first-generation Filipino-American, Andresen’s
chapter greatly impacted me as I began to reflect upon my own experiences. It’s
difficult to admit that I do not know a lot about the country my family came
from but the new ideas presented in the chapter highlight the reasons why. Andresen
states, “… the implementation of an American education policy in the
Philippines was intimately connected with a larger military campaign” (Andresen
72). The most effective way to control a population is through re-education and
creating a cultural perspective that favors the colonizing country, in this
case being the United States. The focus on U.S. culture is still seen all over
the Philippines. For example, there is a tremendous
amount of malls throughout the city and promotes consumerism through media like
billboards. This early shift in education of the people in the Philippines
trickled throughout the generations. Through my own personal reflection, I’ve
come to realize that my parents are also products of the education system that
favors the United States and ultimately
affects me. For example, my parents decided not to teach me how to speak
Tagalog because they were afraid I would be placed in ESL classes in the United
States. They made the decision to favor English over their native tongue
because of their cultural perspective framed by the Filipino education system.
The
physical and mental consequences of colonization are described well in Santiago
Bose’s article and can be seen in Kidlat Tahimik’s film, Perfect Nightmare. What struck me the most about both Bose’s
article and Tahimik’s film is the fact that both perspectives conclude that no
matter how hard they try, they will never be fully accepted or understood in a
purely Western culture. Before coming to the Philippines, I never had the
chance to critically explore my own identity. The physical consequences of
colonization can be seen through globalization, environmental changes, and
changes in policies. The mental consequences, on the other hand, are not easily
recognized because of the situational context we try to detect them. The
majority of my own education was framed by the United
States. Because of this, my own cultural perspective is handicapped so it’s
difficult for me to articulate the ways in which my identity is compromised. With
all of this in mind, I am interested in further discussing the methods we can use
to identify and challenge how colonization changes the perspective of the
country’s inhabitants and those who immigrated away.
References
Alcantara, E.R. (2002)
Bagiuo between two wars: The creation and destruction of a summer capital. In Shaw, A.V. & Francia, L.H. Vestiges
of war. (pp. 207-223). New York: New York
Press.
Andresen, T. (2012).
Knowledge construction, transformative academic knowledge, and Filipino American identity and experience, In E.
Bonus, E. & D. Maramba, (Eds.) The “other“ students: Filipino Americans, education, and power.
Charlotte, NC: IAP.
Bose, S. (2002). Bagiuo
Graffiti. In A.V. Shaw & L.H Francia, Vestiges of war. (pp. 260-67).
New York: New York Press.


No comments:
Post a Comment