As I sit back and reflect on my experiences, it's hard to
put any of it into words. When people ask me how my trip was, it seems nearly impossible
to be able to even slightly express what it was truly like being in the
Philippines for even just a month. Just as others don't know what life is like
in the Philippines without going there themselves, I play the role of the
outsider as well, being that I am a white American visiting the Philippines, I
will never fully experience what most Filipinos living in the Philippines do.
Yet, despite my own difference, I attempted to connect with others in search of
what a ‘true’ Filipino is, hoping to connect with them and experience that
myself. As I got to know more and more people, connecting with various people
throughout our excursions, several things became apparent to me. Despite all of
the hardship that plagues the Philippines, the most notably thing that I
noticed was that people there are happy. This fact alone acted as a true wake
up call, reminding me that as much value as American society places on money,
it’s not money that buys one’s happiness.
Initially I was unsure of what to expect when arriving in
the Philippines. Having heard about the Spanish, American, and even Japanese
occupation that the Philippines endured for over 300 years combined, I was
curious as to what the remaining effects would be. As we delved deeper in
Filipino culture, it become apparent that even almost 75 years after their
independence was declared, the Philippines is still heavily dependent on both
American culture and politics. It was sad to realize that for over 400 years,
the Philippines were developed solely under colonial rule. In his piece, Ileto
expresses his own opinions on the dynamics of the relationship between the
United States and the Philippines. One topic that he focuses on is ‘amigo
warfare,’ the Filipino style of resistance in which Filipinos were friendly
towards Americans during the day or when confronted, but at night or when no
one was looking, they were guerrillas (Ileto, The Philippine American War,
Friendship and Forgetting). I found the fact that Americans identified this
shifting of identities as anything other than a mirror image of their own
tactics to be ironic, after all, it was the Americans who staged a mock battle
in order to make it seem like they were protecting Filipinos, when in reality,
they tricked, tortured and killed them mercilessly for their own advantages.
The United States’ primary goal was to colonize the
Philippines for it’s own advantage, while falsely stating that it was for the
sake of the Filipinos rather than for their American imperialistic ideals. The
Americans brought with them their own customs and beliefs, placing claim on
anything they desired. In their conquest, the Americans stole from, killed, and
abused Filipinos, implementing their own system of ideals in suppression of the
native Filipino identity. After years of being told that they were inferior to
Americans, Filipinos began to shift their perspective into one that focused on
this belief, leading to the belief that "Mother America" is owed a
lifelong inner debt, or utangna hob, by the Filipino people she nurtured”
(Ileto, The Philippine American War, Friendship and Forgetting).
Through their colonization of the Philippines, the Americans
acted under a veil of secrecy, disguising their goal of complete control of the
Philippines as a mission to reeducate and civilize the people of the
Philippines, although the Americans never had any intentions of implementing
their systems throughout the islands for the sake of Filipinos. In his piece,
Constantino discusses how effective capturing one’s mind can be, stating, “The
molding of men's minds is the best means of conquest.” As a result, education
“serves as a weapon in wars of colonial conquest” (Constantino “The Miseducation of the Filipino”) . A major
component of the implementation of an American system was the reeducation of
the Philippines. As Constantino points out in his piece, the educational system
introduced by the Americans had to correspond, and was designed to correspond,
to the economic and political reality of American conquest (Constantino “The
Miseducation of the Filipino”).
Another way that America hoped to restructure the
Philippines was through the implementation of their own national language,
English. By replacing native Filipino dialects with English, America helped to
dissolve Filipino identity and maneuverability by limiting their ability to
interact with, and counteract American colonization. By setting English as a
standard in the educational system, America created a new generation of
Filipino-Americans, one that “had already come of age thinking and acting like
little Americans.” As a result of this new educational system, the native
Filipino was misled and misinformed, replacing any Filipino nationalism with a new
surge of American nationalism.
Colonial mentality has been defined as a specific form of
internalized oppression following colonialism (David and Okazaki, The
Colonial Mentality Scale for Filipino Americans). The colonial mentality that
came about as a result of this Americanization of the Philippines is directly reminiscent
of America’s treatment of the Philippines. The new mentality adopted by
Filipinos was measured as five correlated factors that reflect five distinct
ways colonial mentality has been manifested by Filipinos. David and Okazaki identified
these manifestations as “internalized cultural and ethnic inferiority, cultural
shame and embarrassment, within-group discrimination, physical characteristics,
and colonial debt” (David and Okazaki, The Colonial Mentality Scale for
Filipino Americans).
As I spent time connecting with Filipinos, I began to
understand how much colonial mentality still affects the Philippines today. An
overwhelming number of people I spoke to communicated a desire to visit and
move to America, expressing jealously of my own position as an American. Many
of them spoke of ‘the American Dream,’ but when asked what this meant, had no
clear explanation for; they simply maintain this concept of colonial mentality,
and the idea that life is better in America. Ironically enough, it was the
people of the Philippines who showed me how good life can be despite not having
much. As a foreign visitor, I constantly observed and thought about not only
the differences between America and the Philippines, but about all of the
differences that I found between myself and the people of the Philippines.

One of the best aspects of this entire trip was the group
dynamic. Being able to experience such an adventure oneself is an amazing
experience, but being able to share it with others makes it an incredible
experience. It was a privilege to be able to go on this program with such a
diverse group of individuals and it was rewarding to see what everyone had to
offer each other, because each of us were of a vastly different background. The
combination of each individual and personality on this program allowed a
family-like dynamic to develop, which, as we all know, can set the stage for
some excitement.
Personally, I benefited a lot from being a part of this
group. As always, when in a group, each person has something that they can
offer to the larger group as a whole. Over time, it was interesting to see
people’s personalities develop as they learned more about each other, becoming
closer and closer as the days passed. It was impossible not to become connected
to each member of the group, as they essentially became a member of our family,
living, eating and sleeping in such close quarters. Being a part of the group,
my biggest advantage was being able to get a firsthand insight into so many
different perspectives. As mentioned, with each of us coming from such a
different background, many viewpoints different from my own were brought up. I
was able to see a lot of things from another’s perspective, which is an eye
opening experience, ultimately resulting in a higher level of understanding.
When working and living together as a group, one must remain
selfless. There are many times that one must consider others before they
consider themselves. At times, within the group, issues arose, but mostly
simple matters. Any time there was a concern, people dealt with it accordingly,
putting the issue on the table and reaching a common resolution. When issues
arose within the group as a whole, we sat down as a group and reach a
resolution. For the most part, everybody supported everybody in any way that
they could. People offered each other everything from snacks, food, medicine,
sunblock and bug spray, to whatever else might have been needed by another in
the group. When decisions needed to be made, they were brought up within the
group. Everybody’s opinions were accounted for, and as a group, we tried to
respect and accommodate everyone. When it came down to it, for the most part decisions
were based off of what we could do that would satisfy the biggest number of
people.
The contributions that everybody brought with them are
innumerable. Individually, each member of this group acted as one piece of the
puzzle, which when put together, is completed. Each member helped to balance
the group as a whole, offering insight into areas untouched by others.
Personally, I know that each member of this group helped to teach me more about
myself and my own position in the world. Time after time, I was left
speechless; dumbfounded by a realization or point brought forth by another
member of the group that I had never before considered. Each of us are walking
away from this experience with a new family to remember and keep in touch with.
Everybody found their niche within the group and it was rewarding to be able to
see everybody laugh and smile together as we counted our last moments together.
Even now, two weeks after the program ended, I think that we each are still
realizing how much this trip has changed us, how affected by everything we
were, and how rewarding it was to be a part of our group. As the weeks pass and
I continue to process our summer in the Philippines, I become more and more thankful
for how much perspective this trip has given me.
Works
Cited
Constantino,
R. (1982). Miseducation of Filipinos. In I In A.V. Shaw & L.H
Francia, Vestiges of war. (pp. 177-192). New York: New York Press.
David,
E.J.R., & Okazaki, S. (2006). The Colonial Mentality Scale (CMS) for
Filipino Americans: Scale construction and psychological implications: A review
and recommendation.
Journal of Counseling Psychology 53 (1), pp. 1–16.
Ileto, R.C. (1998). The Philippine-American War, Friendship
and Forgetting. In Shaw,A.V. & Francia, L.H. Vestiges of war. (pp.
3-21). New York: New York Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment