Education was the preferred method
of the United States for the implementation of colonial rule. The
implementation of a system which “was not merely to create a passive populace
sought by the military but rather to mold people who could be active participants
in the American-style government and economy” (Paulet, 2007, p. 183). Today, American influence is alive and thriving, especially in the university setting.
How has the educational system forced on Filipinos changed their way of life
and the way they see themselves?
According to Paulet (2007),
children were taught how to be civilized, especially by teaching the young
girls what a civilized home should look like inside and out; thus, “proper”
cooking and cleaning were part of the curriculum during this time (p. 195).
Interestingly enough, although we never saw a home’s interior, many of the
houses in Bohol were modeled in the western style. One of our classmates
pointed out that advertisement was not as pervasive in Bohol as it was in
Manila and Baguio but it was just easy to get sucked into the tourist
experience. Indeed, my eyes were glossed over during most of our trip to Bohol
until I saw a man crossing one of the suspended bridges with his dog which we
had paid to cross as an attraction. This is when I realized that what was a
tourist attraction to us was some else’s life. I was reminded that the United States
used education as “a means of inculcating the indigenous populace with American
values, thereby enabling them to accept American control and intervention” (2007,
p. 193) Yet, I could not help but think that maybe the inhabitants had a façade
for the tourist; a façade that they need not maintain in the privacy of their
homes.
![]() |
Man walking home with his dog, Bohol. |
One of the most noticeable
contrasts between the metropolis and all of the towns we have traveled to
throughout our stay in the Philippines has been the change of pace in
lifestyle. It is something that can easily be mistaken or romanticized by
outsiders and Filipino city dwellers. Constantino (1982) argues that “this
idealized picture of farm life never emphasizes the poverty, the disease, the
cultural vacuum, the sheer boredom, the superstition and ignorance of backward
farm communities” is a portrait that is being painted by the history books for young Filipinos (p. 182). Although this portrait addresses the minimal medical intervention and low income living, these words should be read with caution as they make assumptions and very broad generalizations
about farm life. According to Constantino (1982) the American education system is still at work in the Philippines but the problem with this is that "the gap between the two societies is very large. In fact, they are two entirely different societies with different goals" (p. 184). So why are Filipinos trying to adopt the colonizers language during today?
During our visit to Ateneo de
Manila University we found out that the new educational system in the
Philippines is getting rid of Filipino classes or making them optional. When asked
if this change would mean the death of native languages Dr. Campomanes
responded that he was not worried about the languages “dying off.” According to
him, groups like the Ilocano do not have to sacrifice their native language
with the standardization of English because he sees people making conscious
choices every day to speak their native tongues. When asked why English was
chosen over Filipino some of the professors pointed out that Tagalog was chosen
by default became logistically the Tagalog speaking provinces led the
revolution against the Spaniards and the Americans, but it is not
representative of the population. Constantino (1982), on the other hand, is
making the argument that language must be standardized to create a strong
nation state but he believes it should be the native language not the language
of the oppressor (p.186). The problem with
standardization remains intact: imposing English or Tagalog onto the population
ignores the linguistic diversity of the islands. Language poses one of the
biggest challenges for scholars today.
![]() |
University of Santo Tomas, the first westernized educational institution in Asia. |
Constantino, R. (1982). Miseducation of Pilipinos. In A.V.
Shaw & L.H Francis, Vestiges of war. pp.
177-192. New York: New York Press.
David, E.J.R., & Okazaki, S. (2006). The Colonial
Mentality Scale (CMS) for Filipino Americans: Scale
construction and
psychological implications: A review and recommendation. Journal of Counseling
Psychology 53 (1), pp. 1-16.
Paulet, A. (2007). To change the world: The use of American
Indian education in the Philippines. History
of
Educational Quarterly, 47(2), 173-202.
No comments:
Post a Comment